My previous analysis on CapitaLand Mall Trust (CMT) was on 9 July, let's review after the release of 2Q results on 22 July.
Basic Profile & Key Statistics
NAV has dropped around 4.5% from the previous quarter. TTM dividend yield also dropped, which is expected as DPU drop because of COVID.
Lease Profile
Occupancy drop slightly to 97.7%. The highest least expiry increased to 33.3% which posts a concentrated lease expiry risk. WALE reduced to 2 years, it is still median for retail SREITs with Singapore properties.
Debt Profile
Gearing ratio increased to 34.4%, but it is still healthy. Cost of debt reduced slightly to 3.1%. Fixed rate debt increase slightly to 51.5% and unsecured debt remain at 100%. Interest cover ratio reduced to 4.3 times, it is still healthy and higher than SREITs median level. WADE is long at 4.5 years where its highest debt maturity of 18.9% will be expiring in the year 2023.
Diversification Profile
No changes in its diversification profile. As a Singapore focus SREIT, CMT is not diversified in terms of geographical. Its top property, top tenant, and top 10 tenants contribute 10.6%, 3.2% and 22.1% respectively.
Key Financial Metrics
Property yield drop to 5%. Due to distribution retention, Management fees over distribution, distribution on capital, and distribution margin figures are affected. Without retention, management fees over distribution would be 12.5% which translates into S$8.00 dividend for every dollar paid. Distribution on capital would be 3.4% and distribution margin would be 48.4%.
Related Party Shareholding
The sponsor and REIT manager hold significant shares. However, directors of REIT manager shareholding is low.
Trend
DPU is affected by COVID situation, else it is on slight uptrend for the past 5 years. NAV per unit is on uptrend, only dropped once in 2Q 2020. Distribution margin more or less maintain throughout past 5 years.
Fundamental Valuation
Favorable | Less Favorable |
Unsecured Debt | Concentrated Lease Expiry |
WADE | Top Geographical Contribution |
Well Spread Debt Maturity | |
Top Property Contribution | |
Top Tenant & Top 10 Tenants Contribution | |
NAV per Unit Uptrend |
Overall, CMT fundamental is slightly affected. However, based on the plus points above, it is still a well managed REIT.
Relative Valuation
i) Average Dividend Yield
Average value at 5.12%, apply past 4 quarters DPU of 9.13 cents will get S$ 1.78. If we take the DPU without retention, then DPU would be 10.52 cents, which translates into S$ 2.05.
ii) Average Price/NAV
Average value is at 1.09, apply latest NAV of S$ 2.011 will get S$ 2.19
Author's Opinion
By now many should have seen the crowd in retail after phase 2 opening, the situation should be improved, although there is a risk of second COVID wave. I believe in the long run, CMT could continue its good performance, especially after the merger with CCT. For valuation:
i) Fundamental Intrinsic Value = (Removed)
ii) Relative Valuation - Dividend Yield = S$ 2.05
iii) Relative Valuation - Price/NAV = S$ 2.19
At the current price of S$ 1.98, it is considered undervalued still.
*Disclaimer: Materials in this blog are based on my research and opinion which I don't guarantee the accuracy, completeness, and reliability. It should not be taken as financial advice or statement of fact. I shall not be held liable for errors, omissions as well as loss or damage as a result of the use of the material in this blog. Please always do your own due diligence before any decision is made.
Frasers Centrepoints seems overvalued, while capmall is undervalued.. interesting
ReplyDeleteIf compare both, relatively CMT is more value for money as of now.
DeleteWhere to find the fixed rate debt percentage?
ReplyDeleteIn CMT quarter presentation.
Delete